Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Meeting to discuss slot changes for 2012


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Meeting to discuss slot changes for 2012
Permalink  
 


December 12 will be the date that a meeting will take place between DNR, Tribal and Mille Lacs Fishery Input Group to discuss proposed slot changes for 2012.

The tone of the meeting has already been set with the DNR fish sampling from the latest gillnet survey.

http://www.millelacsmessenger.com/fishing/40108-dnr-warns-of-2012-mid-season-reg-change 

Any bets on the changes to the slot, if the tribal reps and the DNR get their way?



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Admin / Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would not bet on anything from that group............scary thoughts.......can't wait!



__________________

 


Bob (Bobber) Carlson

 

 

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Date:
Permalink  
 

Please MN DNR- Get a pair and stand up for MN and the Millions of license buying sportspeople!!

I know this will never happen but let a few outsiders come to this meeting and offer input. People that know the lake and the resource and can offer some different views...

COME ON.

IF the "others" need to net- let them do it 2 weeks after opener. Lets see how many WI "others" come over to net...
Ya right.



__________________

Cass_200.gif

RussDaBuss



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

Key word as Bobber says:   SCARY. hmm

Lets hope they make a sensible decision and save a magnificent lake.





__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lets hope our side gets a chance to be listened to.

( I wasn't invited to speak.........evileye)



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Admin / Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
Permalink  
 

From the discussion at the meeting we will continue to have the 18-28 inch protected slot. The plan is to see how the winter months of the ice fishing season goes and monitor the catch rate.

The Mn DNR are also expecting to see and hear this year what The bands have in "their next five year plan" as we are nearing the end of the previous plan.

Sure glad they have a plan? Just can't see why its "wait on them" and "follow thier leadership"??

 

Sure sounds like they have more say.....heck maybe all the say!



__________________

 


Bob (Bobber) Carlson

 

 

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Date:
Permalink  
 

Here is an article I like to post at times. This hits the nail on the head. Joe Fellegy words it perfectly.

And WHERE in the outcome of this court crap does it say- GILL NETS CAN BE USED DURING THE SPAWN OR AT ALL FOR THAT MATTER..???? furious

MN DNR- Step up PLEASE!!!

 

Mille Lacs gill-netting: biggest scam on state's outdoor scene

By Joe Fellegy
Outdoor News, April 14, 2010

I've strongly opposed the only spawning-time walleye gill-net fishery in the United States, without feeling guilty.

Ponder the high-impact Mille Lacs monster: enormous walleye totals, plus tons of unwanted and wasted pike; a giant cultural affront to most Minnesotans, who embrace closed seasons during spawning; gross misrepresentation of Ojibwe culture and history for political purposes; taxpayer millions for tribal, federal, and state management bureaucracies; disproportionately high tribal fish allocations; a tradition of go-with-the-flow acquiescence among state officials, who lost an air-tight case and helped shape the present intolerable system.

Consider, too, the hands-off approaches by journalists, politicians, and the conservation community. And there's the modern separate-and-unequal race politics - central to the new tribal "sovereignty" - that celebrates differences instead of commonalities.

Almost 20 years ago, the Mille Lacs Band government launched its unnecessary 1837 Treaty case against a generous state that signed compacts for two Mille Lacs Band casinos. Had one polled Band members in 1990 about a spawning-time gill-net fishery, it's likely 90-plus percent would have said no. Unfortunately, the Indian Industry, not the Indian people, ran the show.

In the early 1990s, I attended parties hosted by the late Ron Maddox, St. Paul bar owner, tribal lobbyist, and DFL activist who helped transfer Mille Lacs Band government to the modern Indian Industry's network of consultants, lawyers, lobbyists, p. r. firms, and advocacy groups. Band leader Marge Anderson told us that Mille Lacs Band members generally weren't interested in exercising 1837 fishing rights. Similarly, Don Wedll, the longtime non-Indian mind and voice of the Mille Lacs Band, assured the Minnesota Sportfishing Congress (MSC) there'd be no Wisconsin-style treaty fracas, since the Mille Lacs Band needed only several dozen walleyes annually for ceremonies. (Then why the lawsuit?)

Historically, no Mille Lacs leader made 1837 fishing a cause. After all, in the 1855 Treaty the Band relinquished "all rights, title, and interest of whatsoever nature" in the 1837 Treaty area. In the 1990s, as anglers increasingly worried about gill nets, tribal elder Betty Kegg asked me to explain the fuss over nets and fish. She told me, "Most Indians here don't care about fishing!"

That 'settlement'

No historic rights cause? Indians uninterested in fishing? True. But the new sovereignty had other aims, here and across the country: expand jurisdiction for tribal governments - management authority, political power, and money. Following treaty-rights hassles in Wisconsin, Mille Lacs Band policymakers played on Minnesota fears. They coaxed state personnel, especially from the Sando DNR and the Humphrey Attorney General's Office, into secret negotiations towards a "settlement" to be okayed by the Legislature and by a federal court. Key components of the failed settlement effort: A. Race-based partitioning of Mille Lacs Lake with a Mille Lacs Band "tribal exclusive zone" off the west shore - reminiscent of segregated facilities in the old south. (Had the other seven 1837 Chippewa bands gained similar zones, the total would have covered half the lake.) B. $8 to $10 million for Mille Lacs Band government. C. 7,500 to 15,000 acres of Minnesota public land (not detailed for the public). D. Redefinition of Mille Lacs Indian Reservation - 15 times larger than the one on your highway map.

Related points. . .

  • Most Chippewa netters from the eight 1837 bands, including six from Wisconsin, have no cultural or historic ties to Mille Lacs fishing.

  • No court required gill nets in Mille Lacs. Decisions about harvesting methods, fish allocations, seasons, etc. result from political decisions by management. No court exempted tribal managers from the same every-day scrutiny and politics that visit state DNRs and their decision-making. (Your DNR and lawmakers could okay gill nets, seines, dynamite, 20 lines, and limitless bass-keeping for all state-licensed anglers. But conservation ethics, values, and good politics intervene.)

  • Federal tax dollars fund tribal governments, tribal DNRs, and the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC). (Focus on this Indian Industry, not "the Indians.") Minnesotans fund their state's big role in "treaty fisheries management."

  • Courts never officially divvied up the Mille Lacs fish pie. No final allocation. Nevertheless, citing other cases and "precedent," state lawyers and officials - at what conference table? - surrendered to 50-50 splits for northern pike and perch. Did they open the door to future Indian Industry claims to 50 percent of the annual "safe harvest level" of Mille Lacs walleyes?

  • Somewhere in the legal papers, Minnesota officials have ultimate authority to intervene on conservation grounds. Sacrificial pike alone - for years discarded dead and alive, on the lake, in ditches, and in dumpsters - should justify flexing Minnesota's legal and political muscle.

  • Despite the state's losing case, the U. S. Supreme Court's 1999 ruling provided an out, affirming that the 1837 Chippewa harvest privilege is precarious and temporary - "at the pleasure of the President." Somehow, on this front and on the conservation opening, we've seen no state effort to end the annual madness.

END



__________________

Cass_200.gif

RussDaBuss



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Date:
Permalink  
 

http://www.millelacsband.com/Page_FactSheet_Treaty1837.aspx

A Quote from the Bands Site-

  • Today’s Mille Lacs Band members, like their ancestors, are committed to protecting and preserving natural resources. That is why the Mille Lacs Band worked with the state of Minnesota to develop and implement a conservation code for the 1837 ceded territory.


__________________

Cass_200.gif

RussDaBuss



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

***Deleted by admin***



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 4
Date:
Permalink  
 

I've often thought that if the lake is going to be netted, it should be netted at least half the time by the tribe/tribes that the Ojibwe took the lake away from.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

This is to Joe (Hall of Fame) Fellegy:

Thanks for helping us, friend.

If it wasn't for yours; and a couple a others' voices, we would'nt be heard. That would be bad............

THANK YOU, Joe. 



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

rhorwede wrote:

I've often thought that if the lake is going to be netted, it should be netted at least half the time by the tribe/tribes that the Ojibwe took the lake away from.


 Unfortunately, the Souix never knew "netting" until the French came along. And, more unfortunately, (Especially for the Souix), the French brought the Ojibwe............(Who think they own the place now, no doubt)



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

tat2jonnie wrote:
rhorwede wrote:

I've often thought that if the lake is going to be netted, it should be netted at least half the time by the tribe/tribes that the Ojibwe took the lake away from.


 Unfortunately, the Souix never knew "netting" until the French came along. And, more unfortunately, (Especially for the Souix), the French brought the Ojibwe............(Who think they own the place now, no doubt)


 (I still think Vikings have them by 500 years, easy..........) 



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am going to file a lawsuit on these folks.

Who's with me????

Let's get it back into court...............



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

Soveriegnty????????????

Vikings in America

Vikings in America...does our New World history begin with Columbus, or with ax-swinging sons of Odin?

A great swath of the country apparently favors the redbeards. Viking statues tower over the travel landscape -- from Deerfield, New Jersey, to Kingsburg, California, to Fort Ransom, North Dakota -- humbling our haughty bronze Columbus monuments.

Aside from these, did our fair-haired forefathers leave clues to mark their passing? Some believe that a mysterious stone tower in Newport, RI, is the oldest building in America, built by the Vikings around AD 1050. Most academics think that it was built by a Colonial farmer, or by refugees of a Chinese treasure ship, but since no records exist, how do they know?

Perhaps the most intriguing debris left by Nordic litterbugs are runestones, mighty slabs of rock with cryptic marks carved into them. Alexandria, Minnesota, has the Kensington Runestone, and the story goes that it was found under the roots of an aspen tree by Olaf Ohman, an illiterate local farmer, in 1898. Real or Forgery?

Big Ole.
Big Ole, Alexandria, Minnesota.

Locals believe that the marks are a runic inscription describing a Viking expedition in 1362. The Smithsonian Institution was less enthusiastic about the runestone's authenticity, but they couldn't disprove it, either. And what about the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Indians that missionaries later reported, living in huts "in the Viking style"?

Alexandria's claim to be "Birthplace of America" rests on their runestone. Big Ole, a 28-ft. tall fiberglass Viking statue, lets visitors know that Alexandria takes the claim seriously, as does a 25-foot-tall replica runestone on Hwy. 27, east of the the city. But the authentic item in the Kensington Runestone Museum is at the core of any Nordic parenting claims. "We know there're other runestones out there," says the lady at the museum. "But this is kind of the main runestone."

One of those others is the Heavener Runestone, in Heavener, Oklahoma. The 12-foot high monolith stands outside, shielded in a big box. According to the folks inthe interpretive center, the enscription on it dates back to AD 600-900, and tells the story of "Glome" who used the rock to lay claim to this part of the Sooner State.

As in Alexandria, the folks here do not diss other runestones, knowing that Alexandria's rock is yet more evidence that Columbus was a Euro-come-lately. "They've got their runestone, we've got ours," the Heavener folks explain. "Ours is older."

Other, less-glamorous runestones are in nearby Poteau and Shawnee. The Vikings (or some local farmers) were busy boys.

RUNES, ALPHABET OF MYSTERY

 

 

Ship Pendent

 

 

North American Rune Stones

 

Several rune stones have been found in the United States, most notably the Kensington Runestone in Minnesota and the Heavener Stone in Oklahoma. There is considerable debate over their age and validity. The "Kensington Runestone" is a slab of gray stone, measuring 36 inches long, 16 inches wide, and 6 inches thick. It contains runic writing along the face of the stone and along one edge. The stone was found by a Minnesota farmer named Olaf Ohman in November of 1898 while a digging up a poplar tree stump on the southern slope of a 50-foot high knoll. The stone was buried face down about six inches below the surface, with the tree roots wrapped around it. Mr. Ohman and his sons saw the runic letters but did not know what they were.

 

Unfortunately, the stone was not left in place, so they were unable to demonstrate its obvious age from the growth pattern of the tree. The stone was sent to the University of Minnesota and then to Chicago. It was was studied by runic scholars, who interpreted the inscription to be an account of Norse explorers in the 14th Century. Many authorities who have since examined the stone have claimed it a forgery, but others are equally certain of its authenticity.

 

It is known King Magnus of Sweden sent that a party to Greenland in 1355. They never returned. It is very possible that these men were from that party. The stone bears the date of 1362. The transliteration of the text is generally accepted as:

 

"Eight Goths and 22 Norwegians on a journey of exploration from Vinland very far west. We had camp by 2 rocky islands one day's journey north from this stone. We were out fishing one day. After we came home we found 10 men red with blood and dead. AVM [Ave Maria] save us from evil."

 

The inscription along the edge of the stone says:

 

"Have 10 men by the sea to look after our ships 14 days' journey from this island. Year 1362."

 

The stone is now in the Runestone Museum in Alexandria, Minnesota, near where the stone was found.

 

Update: At a 2000 conference in St. Paul, attended by archaeologists from about 20 states and three Canadian provinces, a Minnesota geologist and a Wisconsin chemist presented what they say is indisputable evidence that the runestone inscription is "real" and old, probably from the 1300s. Scott Wolter, president of American Petrographic services, is a licensed Minnesota geologist. He was instrumental in analyzing the stone's surfaces with Barry Hanson, a chemist and project manager for nonprofit archeology group, Archeology ITM, and Paul Weiblen, professor emeritus in geophysics at the University of Minnesota. Weiblen published a 45-page report on the mineralogy of the stone, and concludes that the carvings are significantly older than 1898, when it was discovered.

 

  

Kensington Rune Stone

Mr Ohmnan

Mr. Ohman and the Runestone

 

 

Kensington Map

Possible Viking Routes to Minnesota from Greenland:
via the Hudson Bay and the Nelson and Red Rivers
or via the St. Lawrence River and the Great Lakes.

 

Dr. Richard Nielsen, president of Houston Texas-based Nielsen Engineering, studies linguistics as a hobby. His research involving 14th century legal documents known as "Swedish Diplomas", reveals linguistic evidence linking the writing style and expressions on the stone to the vernacular found in historical legal documents of the period between 1355 and 1375. During the 14th century many of the educated scribes died of the bubonic plague. Less educated writers introduced vernacular into the legal documents during that period. Download his 74-page article in PDF format.

 

Thomas Reiersgord, author of The Kensington Rune Stone: Its Place in History, believes that the "10 men red with blood", were not killed by Indians, but were victims of the bubonic plague, carried in its incubation period from Europe, by one or more carriers in the group. In its pneumatic form the plague spreads and kills rapidly, the victims vomiting blood as well as covered with bloody pustules.

 

The "Heavener Runestone" of Oklahoma is a slab about 12 feet high, 10 feet wide, and 16 inches thick with runic letters spelling out the word "Gaomedat". By reversing two runes which appear to be different from the others, the inscription becomes "Glomedal", or "Glome's Valley". It could also be rendered "G. Nomedal". Nomedal is a Norwegian family name. Thanks to the efforts of Gloria Farley, the area surrounding the stone is now the Heaven Rune Stone State Park. The stone is now protected inside a building erected around it. The official theory is that the stone was erected as a boundary marker between 600 A.D. and 900 A.D.

 

Heavener Rune Stone

 

Old-timers related that there were many more stones in the area, but most were destroyed by treasure hunters in the 1930s and 1940s. Neither of the Heavener Runestones Numbers Two or Three have enough runes to render a translatable message. In 1967, another stone was found near Ponteau, Oklahoma.

 

Heavener 2

Heavener #2

 

The second stone, which measured 30 by 14 inches and 20 inches thick, shows 12-inch, three-pronged symbol on a stem, the runic "R". Below it on the side surface was a small mark which later proved to be a "bindrune," or combination of two runes. This stone is called "Heavener Runestone Number Two.

 

Heavener 3

Inscription on Heavener #3

 

On Heavener Three an "X," a "turkey track," and an arrow shape: the runes for "G," "R," and "T," respectively. The letters, 6 to 9 inches tall, appear in a triangular pattern on a stone 5 1/2 feet long. Neither of the Heavener Runestones Numbers Two or Three have enough runes to render a translatable message.

 

Poteau Rune Stone

Poteau Stone

 

The Poteau stone, found by schoolboys in 1967, is 15 inches long. There are seven characters in a straight line, l 1/2 to 2 inches high. The runes showed very plainly because the bottom of the grooves were in a lighter colored layer of the stone, while the surface was dark. Tool marks in the grooves showed that the letters had been made with a punch, like the Heavener Runestone. Four of the runes are duplicates of those on the Heavener Runestone, and three seemed to be variants of others on it. From the site of the Poteau stone, the Heavener Runestone on the side of Poteau Mountain lies about 10 miles to the southeast. The original sties of Heavener Runestones Numbers Two and Three fall in a line between them.

 

There are several more theories regarding the Heavener stones. In 1967, Alf Monge, a former US Army cryptographer asserted that the symbols are a runic puzzle, indicating a date, equivalent to November 11, 1012, St. Martin's Day, on our calendar. According to Monge, all of the cryptic runic messages in North American and those found in Stave Churches in Norway, are deciphered as dates of church holidays. He feels there is evidence that the creator of this puzzle and others found in North America was Eirik Gnupsson, known as Henricus, who was made Bishop of Greenland in 1112. Henricus was believed to have made several trips to Vinland and farther inland. Monge says Henricus left seven runic puzzles including the Kensington Rune Stone, the Heavener Rune Stone and the Spirit Pond Rune Stone. This is discussed in two books by O.G. Landsverk: Runic Records of the Norsemen in America, Erik J Friis Publisher, 1974, and Ancient Norse Messages on American Stones, Norseman Press, 1969., and in Earl Syversen's Norse Runic Inscriptions: with their long-forgotten cryptography, Vine Hill Press.

 

Monge's solution to the Poteau inscription is another date, November 11, 1017 A.D., exactly five years later than the date he said was on the Heavener Runestone. The seventh symbol on the Poteau Runestone is not in the standard runic alphabets but was a runic symbol for the numeral 17.

 

The early Norse calendar is based upon a cycle of 19 days, or Golden Numbers. The Younger Futhark was used to number those days. There are, of course, only 16 staves in the Younger Futhark, so three new symbols were devised to represent 17, 18, and 19.

 

Golden Numbers

 

Yet another stone was found in Shawnee, Oklahoma. Its five runes, all from the 24-rune Elder Futhark, spells out "MEDOK." Medok is similar to Madoc, the name of a Welsh prince. Ancient records state that he came to America in the year 1170 A.D., then returned to Wales for ten shiploads of colonists which he led up the Mississippi River. However, the Welsh did not use third century A.D. Norse runes and the name Medok is not Madoc. Alf Monge studied the inscription on the Shawnee Runestone and said it was another Norse cryptopuzzle, giving the date November 24, 1024 A.D.

 

Shawnee Rune Stone

Shawnee Runestone

 

While agreeing that the Heavener stone bears a cryptic message, Dr. Lee Woodward, a Sallisaw, Oklahoma minister, believes it is a monument to Rene Robert Cavelier de la Salle, a French explorer, who was murdered in 1687. Woodward asserts that la Salle was killed in the area of Heavener, not in East Texas as is commonly believed. He concludes that the stone was carved by Gemme Hiens, whom he refers to as a "German-English linguistic and artistic genius who had been a companion of La Salle from 1684-1687... Hiens did his monument in form of a runic riddle, not wanting all to readily recognize what he was doing. His riddle called for identification of a 'Grandly Famous French Man and his dates' (G. NOM E (t) DAT(es). He then cleverly answered the riddle in a way which be very clearly seen at the monument (D' La Salle, 21 Novembre 1643-19 Mars 1687). Those are birth and death dates of La Salle." Dr Lee Woodward's theory is explained in his book, Secret La Salle Monument and Historical Marker,

 

Richard Nielsen, an American engineer and Norse scholar, feels that the runes should be read literally, not as puzzles. He says that the second and last runes on the Heavener Runestone, which had been considered an "A" and a "T," were actually versions of "L," and that the seventh rune on the Poteau inscription was a double "L" in the form of a bindrune, a combination of two runes using one vertical stroke for a stem line. Nielsen believes that all the runes on the Heavener, Poteau, and Shawnee inscriptions are from the Elder Futhark The Heavener runes transliterated into "G L O M E D A L." , "Glome's Valley". The Poteau runes read "G L O I A L L W (ALU)." He says that he found that "Gloi," is a nickname for "Glome," thus the two stones are related to the same man. The word "ALU" is a magical formula. This language was used around 600 A.D. and is the key to the new dating of the Oklahoma Runestones. The stones were made, according to Nielsen, between 600 and 900. Nielsen's essay "Early Scandinavian Incursions Into The Western States", discusses the Kensington runestone as well as the Heavener stone.

 

spiritpond2.gif

Spirit Pond Rune Stone

 

The Spirit Pond runestones were found in Maine in 1971. One bears a rough map of the area, the second has runic writing on one side. On the third, there are ten lines of runes on one side and six on the other. The inscription tells of a sudden storm and fearful men trying to save their ship from "the foamy arms of Aegir, angry god of the sea". This stone, too, has been called a hoax. I think that it is reasonable that Vikings, who were known to have built a settlement in Newfoundland, might very well have traveled south to Maine. As mentioned above, cryptologist Alf Monge believes that the stone is genuine, but its tale is not to be taken literally. He asserts that is a runic puzzle by Henricus, 12th century Bishop of Greenland.

 

Links

Why the Kensington Runestone is Authentic, by Yuri Kuchinsky

Debunking the Kensington Stone Mystery by Timothy Mills

Is the Kensington Runestone the Genuine Article? Two American linguists find authentic mark of antiquity on the Kensington Stone; by Keith A.J. Massey and Kevin Massey-Gillespie

Kensington Runestone Information and Analysis - by Mike Zalar

Kensington Runestone by J. Huston McCulloch

Kensington Runestone Home Page by Bill Hoyt

Kensington Runestone Museum

Geologist thinks Kensington Runestone Not a Hoax , by Peg Meier / Star Tribune

Runestone Examined: Real or Hoax? by Scott Wolter and Sherry Veglahn, American Engineering Testing, Inc.

Cornell University News: Midwest explored by Scandinavians in Middle Ages, according to Robert A. Hall Jr., professor emeritus of linguistics.

Oklahoma Rune Stones - a chapter from Gloria Farley's book.

"In Plain Sight"--Old World Records in Ancient America - Gloria Farley's homepage.

Opich Family - Visit to the Heavener Runestone Site

Runic Proof - evidence of runic types found on the Codex Runicus

Spirit Pond inscription

The Spirit Pond Stones and the Mysterious "Facts" of their Fabrication, by Suzanne Carlson. See also North American Rim for further discussions of the Kensington Runestone, Sprit Pond stone and Newport Tower.

Marion Dahm - Viking Research & Exploration From Years of 1000 to 1362

Vinland Index page - this is part of the Viking Navy website. See both links for various findings and theories about Vikings in North America.

American Epigraphics -Norse Runes - discusses findings in Oregon and elsewhere.

 

Books

Blegen, Theodore C.: Kensington Rune Stone : New Light on an Old Riddle . Minnesota Historical Society, 1960, ISBN=0873510445.

Flom, George Tobias. The Kensington Rune Stone: An Address. Springfield; Phillips Bros., 1910.

Hall, Robert Anderson: The Kensington Rune-Stone: Authentic and Important , A Critical Edition (Edward Sapir Monograph Series in Language, Culture and Cognition, Vol. 19)Jupiter Press, 1995, ISBN=0933104316.

Hall, Robert Anderson: The Kensington Rune-Stone is Genuine , Linguistic, Practical, Methodological Considerations. Hornbeam Press, ISBN=0917496213.

Hanson, Barry: Kensington Runestone--A Defense of Olof Ohman, The Accused Forger. Includes articles written by linguist Richard Nielsen and mineralogy explanations of recent runestone testing.

Holand, Hjalmar: : The Kensington Rune Stone: The Oldest Native Document of American History, Ephriam, WI: Private Printing, 1919.

Holand, Hjalmar R.: The Kensington Stone: A Study in Pre-Columbian American History. , Ephriam, WI: Private Printing, 1932.

Landsverk, Ole Godfred: The Kensington Rune-Stone: A Reappraisal of the Circumstances under which the Stone was Discovered, Glendale: Church Press, 1961.

Nilsestuen, Rolf M.:The Kensington Runestone Vindicated . University Press of America, 1996, ISBN= 0819197491. Nilsestuen is not a scholar, but rather an irascible retiree, who dug into and revealed the scandalous mishandling of many of the prior investigations. He rants, but he makes a strong argument.

Redmond, Jeffery R.: Viking Hoaxes in North America., New York: Carlton Press, 1979. This author asserts that the Kensington Rune Stone was a fraud.

Reiergord, Thomas: The Kensington Rune Stone: Its Place in History. Pogo Pr;, 2001. ISBN=1880654245. The language used on the rune stone is the same as the vernacular on historical legal documents written between 1355 and 1375.

Rogers, Elwin: Labyrinths of Speculation: The Kensington Rune Stone, 1898-1998. E.E. Rogers; ISBN= 1575790963.

Wahlgren, Erik: The Kensington Rune-Stone: A Mystery Solved., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1958. He believes the runestone is a forgery.

Wahlgren, Erik: "The Runes of Kensington". Studies in Honor of Albert Morey Sturtevant., Westport: Greenwood Press, 1970.

 

BackNext

 

-

Go to....INDEX----RUNES AND DIVINATIONIntroduction to RunesOrigins of the RunesMeanings of the Rune SymbolsWrite in RunesBlank Rune ControversyPronunciation of the Rune NamesRunecasting - DivinationRunecasting LayoutsRunecasting AspectsMake a Rune SetTarot CorrespondencesA Runecaster's LamentRunic Tattoos----RUNES AND MYTHOLOGYThe Rune PoemsNew Rune PoemsNorse MythologyNorse Gods, Kennings, DefinitionsAsatruThe Poetic EddaThe Prose EddaHavamalHeimskringlaSagas - Other Literature----RUNES AND MAGICAn Awareness of MagickRunic MagickThe Aettir in MagickOdin's Rune MagickRune Charms - Rune MagickRune Charms for Warriors & for PeaceGaldr - Verbal Rune MagickThe Merseburger IncantationsSeidr - Shamanism - Trance TravelNidstang - A runic "cursing pole"Stadhagaldr - Runic YogaStav - Runic Martial Arts----RUNESTONES AND VIKINGSRune Stones - Marker StonesSleipnir Rune StoneNorth American Rune StonesHalristinger - Stone CarvingsVikings!----LEARN MORE ABOUT RUNESRecommended Reading ListRunes BibliographyMythology - Religion BibliographyHistory - Culture BibliographySagas - Literature BibliographyReference Center----RUNE HOTLINKSSunny's Favorite Runic WebsitesRune Websites Around the WorldCommerical Rune Sites - RunesetsRune Fonts and Runecasting ProgramsWebrings, Affiliations, Awards----LET'S TALK ABOUT RUNESMessage BoardGuestMapSend a Runic Internet Greeting CardTell a friend about the site!E-mail Sunny

 

-

Also see: Modern Viking Tributes



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

 This is proof that the Vikings (my ancestors) were here WAY before these Ojibwes or Chippewas or "The People" whatever they're calling themselves this week...........

http://kensingtonmn.com/runestonepg.html

AND WE KNOW HOW TO FISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

We don't need no stinking nets..................



__________________

Cass_200.gif



Admin / Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1254
Date:
Permalink  
 

http://www.startribune.com/sports/outdoors/135551613.html

 

More.....



__________________

 


Bob (Bobber) Carlson

 

 

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 215
Date:
Permalink  
 

And then more....from today's headlines.

 



__________________

 

http://www.savemillelacssportfishing.org/

Steve Fellegy
651-270-3383

Guide Information



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 130
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good Reading and I agree- I could type forever here... The whole thing is such POLITICAL BS-
I again am emailing my reps and the good OLD Governor. Cant hurt. I encourage the same. Remind the GOV of his talks during his campaign.

What better case could the DNR and State ask for - COME ON...




__________________

Cass_200.gif

RussDaBuss



Malmo Bay Bomber

Status: Offline
Posts: 1502
Date:
Permalink  
 

Good Postings Steve!

Where the hell is Governor Dayton?

The DNR just makes excuses.



__________________
Take care
Come Walleye  
Malmo Mike Callies


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 215
Date:
Permalink  
 

MCallies wrote:

Good Postings Steve!

Where the hell is Governor Dayton?

The DNR just makes excuses.

He can't hide from me! I will draw him out and eventully, sooner than later for sure, put a TV camera in his face and ask him to stand behind his campaign promise...

Ain't gonna happen...I will NOT back off!


 



__________________

 

http://www.savemillelacssportfishing.org/

Steve Fellegy
651-270-3383

Guide Information



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 671
Date:
Permalink  
 

The political powderkeg's fuse is lit.



__________________

Cass_200.gif

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard